Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Monday At the Movies on Tuesday: Star Trek


Movie: Star Trek (2009)
Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Directed By: J.J. Abrams
Writers: Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman
Gene Roddenberry (television series "Star Trek")


I confess I was never a big fan of the original Star Trek television show. I did, however, like Star Trek: the Next Generation--at least the few seasons I saw of it. I did not jump into it right away, and only came into the show after it had been on air for a little while. Captain Picard was one of my favorite characters as was Deanna Troy. I figured if I could be anyone in the world, I would most want to be an empath. I also came to really like the least successful of the bunch, Enterprise. It had an unpolished feel to it; plus, I was happy to see Scott Bakula back on television.

My husband had been on pins and needles for quite awhile in anticipation of the new Star Trek movie; and I have to admit that his excitement was contagious. I am a fan of J.J. Abrams work. He hooked me long ago with Alias and Lost. And so it was with high expectations that we walked into the movie theater Friday morning (my mouth still numb from that morning's dental visit) and took our seats amongst the other moviegoers. I was eager to see J.J. Abrams fresh spin on the franchise.

Anjin and I were not disappointed. The movie chronicles the early years of Kirk and Spock in addition to other crew members of the U.S.S. Enterprise. They are a part of the Federation, an exploratory and peace keeping organization that travels through space. James T. Kirk and Spock are forced to work together despite their animosity when the planet Vulcan is threatened by a rogue Romulan hell bent on destroying it. He blames the Vulcans for being the ruin of his own family and home.

The movie is well cast; Chris Pine played the young James T. Kirk and Zachary Quinto took on the role of Spock. One of my favorite characters in the movie, Dr. Leonard "Bones" McCoy, was played by Karl Urban. I hope to see more of him in the sequel. For fans of the franchise, the new movie takes familiar relationships and makes them fresh again, adding unexpected twists, while at the same time being a great introduction to an unforgetable cast of characters.

Eric Bana was fantastic as Nero, the main antagonist in the film. There have been grumblings that the villain was not a big enough foe in the film, but I do not think he was meant to be. Star Trek is an origin film, and much of the focus is on the coming together of the crew, their developing relationships and their own internal struggles. Personally, I thought Nero's own issues fit in well with those of Spock and Kirk.

Before you think that the movie was all drama, there was plenty of action throughout the film. My husband couldn't help but gush about the sound effects afterward. Fans of Star Trek will see plenty of reminders from the original movies and television show (remember the Red Shirt?), and I doubt new fans will have trouble catching on quickly to the story. The movie was pure entertainment and great fun to watch. It definitely lived up to my expectations.

Monday's Movie is hosted by Sheri at A Novel Menagerie.


Sunday, May 10, 2009

Review: Precious by Sandra Novack

To find someone suddenly gone, to see them one day and not know that this will be the last day you see them, to not have the moment register until hours, days later, or years, is never easy. How we catch ourselves as life moves forward, thinking about that last moment and about what we might have done differently, if only we'd known. [pg 110]


Precious by Sandra Novack
Random House, 2009
Fiction; 274 pgs


Where to begin? From the moment I first entered the world Sandra Novack created in Precious, I was in awe. The novel is beautifully written, lyrical even. At the very heart of the novel is the characters, each one weighed down by the events in their lives which have seemingly swallowed them whole. It is impossible to summarize this book succinctly. There are so many threads running through the novel. A mother who feels trapped in her life and neglected by her husband runs off, leaving behind her husband and two daughters. The repercussions of her actions have grave consequences. The oldest daughter, Eva, finds comfort in sex, taking up an affair with her married high school teacher who is going through his own marital crisis. Nine-year-old Sissy escapes into fantasy, often mixing her day dreams with reality. Frank, the girls' father, is caught up in his own anger and frustration. He is just going through the motions, unable to be there for his daughters in the way they need him to be.

Add to that the sudden disappearance of a young girl in their small Pennsylvania town, which only increases the tensions already surrounding the family. Ginny Anderson, the mother of the missing girl, turns further inward, closing herself off from the rest of the world. Her connection to the Kisch family is twofold. Sissy and the missing girl, Vicki, had been good friends as had Sissy's mother, Natalia, and Ginny.

Natalia's return sets off an entirely new set of consequences for her family. So much has changed in the few months she had been gone.

There is so much to this novel. Each of the characters is flawed and their emotions are raw. Author Sandra Novack captures that so eloquently. One thing I found frustrating and yet so utterly true to life was how alone the characters felt. There were moments when they would come together, share in their pain and grief, but those moments were fleeting. Instead they each stood very much apart from one another, coping in their own ways. How many times did I want to reach out and hug Eva and Sissy?

Abandonment and loss are the two major themes of the novel. Within each of their lives, the characters struggle to deal with their own feelings of loss. The role of family as well as that of love also play a part. The Kisch family and the other various characters in the novel are faced with family crises that test their resolve, make them question their own realities, including the people they hold most dear.

The novel takes place in the summer of 1978, a time period that is quite significant to the setting of the book. The steel industry is showing signs of distress, the effects of the Vietnam War still linger, and it is a time when parents are less afraid for their children's safety--at least until something unimaginable happens to change all that. Natalia's own history as an immigrant child who lost her family during the Holocaust, herself having once lived in a concentration camp, colors her desires and perceptions of the day. Her family were Hungarian gypsies and she still carries bits of that with her. There were so many little threads like these which I would have liked to explore further, but Precious is not the book in which to do that. In this instance, such details helped fill out the characters and bring the story more fully to life.

I enjoyed Precious immensely. It took me a little while to get into it only because I wasn't able to devote much time to reading it at first. Once I was able to sit down and really get into it, I couldn't stop reading. I became a part of the story, my heart ached for so many of the characters--a sure sign that the book got under my skin and stole my heart. This was one of those books I hated to see come to an end.


Rating: * (Very Good +)


Challenge Commitment Fulfilled: ARC Challenge, New Authors Challenge & 2009 Pub Challenge


Check out Sandra Novack's website for more information about the author and her book. You can find excerpts from her novel, Precious, as well as a Q&A with the author which is not to be missed. You can also visit the author at her blog: No Name Writer.

Many thanks to author Sandra Novack and TLC Book Tours for the opportunity to be a part of this book tour.

Sandra Novack's TLC Book Tours TOUR STOPS:
Monday, May 4th: Fizzy Thoughts
Wednesday, May 6th: Book, Line, and Sinker
Thursday, May 7th: Redlady’s Reading Room
Wednesday, May 13th: Bookworm with a View
Thursday, May 14th: Pop Culture Junkie
Monday, May 18th: Literate Housewife
Friday, May 22nd: Booking Mama
Tuesday, May 26th: Book Addiction
Friday, May 29th: Diary of an Eccentric

Sunday Salon: What About That Ending?


A friend and I had a conversation this past week about the endings of books. She has read several books in a particular series and enjoyed each of them. That is, until she read the author's most recent book in which a major character was killed. The series is now counted among my friend's least favorite of all time. She refuses to read further in the series.

Her strong reaction startled me. I cannot imagine turning against a series I like based on the ending of one book. I have read books where favorite characters died (not to mention the tears I shed over them), and yet it has never driven me to so despise a book, much less an entire series. For my friend, the ending is everything. It can ruin even the best of books. And I can see her point. At least in part. An ending can certainly make or break a book.

Endings come in all varieties. Sometimes we are left wondering while at other times everything is wrapped up so neatly, it might as well be tied with a bow. They can be happy or tragic, ambiguous, thought provoking, offer an unexpected twist or be totally predictable. There are endings that take our breath away and those that make us smile. I cannot tell you the number of times my eyes have welled up as I reach the final page. Some of you may have a strong preference for one type of an ending over another. I know my friend does. She prefers the happily ever after variety.

I, on the other hand, like a bit of everything. What is most important to me in regards to an ending is that it fits the rest of the book. A ending should reflect the tone of the entire book. It should match up so that it does not seem forced or too good to be true. Reading a book is like going on a journey. I begin at one spot, experiencing the adventure along the way. When reaching the end, I hope to have gained something, including a bigger appreciation for the entire experience of reading that book.

The topic of endings arose because I was trying to sort out what it was exactly I did not care for about the ending of a book I read recently. I actually enjoyed the book quite a bit. The final outcome was fitting given the circumstances, and yet there was something about it that still did not sit right with me. I am still struggling with what exactly it was that bothered me about the ending. I am all for a Miss Marple ending when it is appropriate--the one where everyone is gathered into one room and the why and how is revealed along with who committed the crime. The ending of the book I read was a variation of that sort of ending, but in this case it felt like it came too soon and a bit too easy. There were also little details given that I felt weren't necessary, having been rehashed throughout the novel at various different stages during the investigation. I am probably making it sound worse than it was. My complaints about the ending are actually quite minor in this case. As I said, I still enjoyed the novel. It has so much else going for it.

It did get me thinking, however, about endings in general. I remember being a tad bit disappointed in the ending of Memoirs of a Geisha by Arthur Golden. While I liked the book overall and was not disappointed with the outcome, I found the ending to be rushed and not in keeping with the flow of the rest of the book. This is perhaps one of my biggest complaints about endings that leave me slightly dissatisfied.

An ending that at first I did not like but came to appreciate later was that of My Sister's Keeper. The ending by many is seen as a cop out, but I disagree. Looking back now, I have a better understanding of why Jodi Picoult went in the direction she did. Her books consistently broach topics that are controversial and she aims to present multiple viewpoints and sides to any issue she addresses. It is up to the reader to form his or her own opinions.

Endings with twists, both big and small can be quite appealing. Crime fiction novels most often offer twists throughout. I have a habit of figuring out the whodunit long before the end though--something that usually will not hamper my enjoyment of a book fortunately. I love reading about the process, how someone got from point A to point B. When a book can catch me off guard, it's an especially praiseworthy moment, however.

I do not mind cliffhangers, but prefer to know about them ahead of time; I do not mean I want the details, just the fact that there is a cliffhanger at all. In times like that, I want to be prepared by having the next book handy. I do not always have the patience to wait until diving into the next book to see what happens next. I clearly remember the moment I finished reading Anne Bishop's Daughter of the Blood, I rushed out to buy a copy of the next two books in the trilogy. For a book that I wasn't even sure I liked during the first half, that's saying quite a bit. It turned out though that the rush was not necessary. I was reminded that sometimes cliffhangers may seem impossible to let go at the end of one book, but when picked up in the next, they may turn out to be rather anticlimactic.

Another ending that stands out in my mind is that of a horror novel. While there may seem to a resolution, that last sentence or epilogue suggests otherwise. I am sure this is a common trait of many horror novels. Back in my high school days when I read every John Saul book I could get my hand on, I ran into those types of endings quite frequently. In my most recent instance, it was a Stephen King novel. I read the novel for an online book group and was reminded of why those bloody/gory slasher horror novels and I don't always get along so well. It's not that they scare me; rather they tend to amuse me. I can suspend my disbelief with just about everything I read, but it's hardest for me with certain types of horror novels these days. As can be expected, the ending of this particular book was left wide open. Good seemed to conquer evil, or did it? While the other women in the reading group were adding a happy ending of their own, I took it in the opposite direction, deciding that things definitely got worse for the characters after I finished the novel. I could not help myself.

Ambiguous endings tend to earn a lot of criticism, but I confess that I am a fan of them. They are often the types of endings that have me thinking of books long after I have finished reading them. Not to mention, they are more realistic. That isn't to say I do not like a good wrap up either. I certainly do and some books just wouldn't seem right without them. As I have said before, it all depends on the book.

I just finished a book with an especially sad ending. Those types of books always leave me feeling a bit melancholy for awhile. After reading a book like that, I am put in the mood for something more uplifting.

The most satisfying of endings are the ones that come full circle. They help put the entire book in perspective. You can always tell when I especially like the ending of a book. Upon closing it, I gently pat the book once, nod my head and let out a sigh.

What about you? Do you prefer a certain type of ending? Are there any endings that especially stand out for you--either good or bad?



Be sure and stop in tomorrow for my review of Precious by Sandra Novack!

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

The Los Angeles Times Festival of Books, April 2009

For Wendy -
Get that bit between your teeth!
Your Pal,
Craig Johnson
Inscription written inside my new copy of The Dark Horse

The weekend was beautiful weather-wise, especially considering how hot the week before had been. I almost wished for rain so it would thin out the crowds, but that would not have been fair to the vendors and authors who had come out for the occasion. Anjin and I have made a tradition of attending the Los Angeles Times Festival of Books each spring. We take in the author panels and browse the booths, often coming home with backpacks full of books and a lot less money in our wallets. This year was not much different, with one big exception: this year we met up with a few fellow book bloggers for the first time. I was both nervous and excited about the opportunity.


Saturday, April 25, 2009, UCLA

On Saturday morning, Anjin and I arrived too late to meet at the designated meet-up spot where the bloggers had agreed to meet, and so we headed straight to Franz Hall for our first panel, Status Update: Social Networking & New Media. We took our seats and it was not long before the room began filling up. And then I heard voices right behind me that sounded awfully familiar. I leaned toward my husband and told him that I thought that might be them. I would know Natasha's voice anywhere. He asked me if I wanted him to say something, but I told him no, I would do it. I just needed to work up the courage. Just then, two women took to the empty seats next to us and I heard one of the women mention Florinda 's and my name. What are the chances that, in such a big room, the book bloggers attending the same panel would sit right there next to us? I took that opportunity to introduce myself to the group. Lisa from Books on the Brain, who had taken the seat next to me, instantly put me at ease. Also there for the panel discussion about social networking were Jill from Fizzy Thoughts, Amy from My Friend Amy, Trish from Hey, Lady! Watcha Readin', Natasha from Maw Books, Tracy from Shelf Life, and Florinda from The 3R’s: Reading, 'Riting, and Randomness. It wasn't until lunch time that I got the chance to meet Ti from Book Chatter. She had attended another panel that morning. Everyone was so nice and friendly.

The Social Networking and New Media panel was comprised of Wil Wheaton (actor, author, twitterer and blogger), Otis Chandler (founder of Goodreads.com, which I decided to try again--as if I need another online community to keep up with), and Sara Wolf (dance critic, e-zine creator and Facebook user). The discussion opened with the role of social media on reading. Otis Chandler mentioned that he had started Goodreads as a way to make reading a social experience. He wanted a place where readers could come to talk about what they are reading, get excited about reading and get recommendations of books to read.

Wil Wheaton had a lot to say on the topic. He is well versed in the different types of social media out there and has used them to his full advantage. He pointed out that technology is not responsible for the dumbing down of society. Both he and Chandler pointed to television as being partly to blame for that. Wheaton talked about the advantages of getting oneself known in a viral atmosphere such as Twitter. He also touched upon the topic of book recommendations made by friends online. Friend recommendations, he said, add legitimacy. How many of us prefer reviews from each other over the more professional reviews today? I know I do. Wheaton went on to say that authors too can find value in the attention their books receive through social media. The author can get a better idea of what readers are getting out of his or her book. Christopher Meeks said something similar on my blog not too long ago.

Sara Wolf's experience with social networks seemed more limited. As a dance critic and the creator of the e-zine Itch, she talked about social media as being a way to "rehearse conceptually." She further described it as a constellation, connecting various people with related ideas together.

The panelists also discussed the importance of incorporating user feedback and quality control. Wheaton said that users have more of an investment in social media, own it in a sense, and therefore their needs and desires should be incorporated. He also suggested that users need play a part in the quality control of social media sites. I immediately thought of LibraryThing.com and how actively involved many of the users are in maintaining the quality of the site along with the founder and his staff. Tim Spalding, of LibraryThing, has done a good job of fostering such an environment. It was an interesting panel, overall.

The panel was followed by lunch. We bloggers found seats at a table at one of the outdoor food courts to eat and chat, getting to know each other a little better. Afterward, we divided up, going our separate ways, some to other panels and Anjin and I to visit the booths.

I was eager to meet Craig Johnson, one of my favorite crime fiction authors, and along the way we discovered a few other authors who I just couldn't pass by without stopping in to visit. I was thrilled to finally meet Christopher Rice (Blind Fall). We also met Gary Phillips (Bangers), and a couple of new-to-me authors, Kate Carlisle (Homicide in Hardcover) and Jonathan Miller (La Bajada Lawyer). Craig Johnson, author of the Sheriff Walt Longmire series, was just as friendly as I imagined he would be. He had driven from Wyoming to California the day before.

In years past, Anjin and I have filled our festival days with panels which meant less time to browse the booths. This year, we decided to go light on the panels and only took two in each day. Our final panel on Saturday was called Religion: The God Question. I was particularly interested in attending this panel because I am reading William Lobdell's book, Losing My Religion. Also on the panel was the moderator, Mr. Zachary Karabell, Chris Hedges, author of I Don't Believe in Atheists, and Rabbi David Wolpe, author of Why Faith Matters. I really did not know what to expect with this panel. I find religion to be a fascinating topic, and I was curious to see what sort of discussion would ensue. The conversation seemed to center on religion as an institution and the positives and negatives of each. Chris Hedges and Rabbi Wolpe dominated the discussion, both offering differing opinions on the topic. They each made many really good points. I walked away from the panel with a lot to think about. In fact, Anjin and I spent much of the ride home from the festival that evening talking about it.

That evening Trish and Lisa treated all of us to dinner at Jerry's Deli in Westwood. Good food and good conversation. Anjin told me later in the evening that he enjoyed listening to us all talk shop. It seemed to end all too quickly when we had to say goodbye.


Sunday, April 26, 2009, ULCA

Sunday dawned early. We hit the road for the hour and a half drive into Los Angeles for the second day of the festival. We managed to snag seats right next to Trish at our first panel for the day, Fiction: Borderlines. Jill joined us as well. Of all the panels that weekend, I had most been looking forward to this one. I was eager for the chance to hear and meet author Thrity Umrigar (The Weight of Heaven) as well as Uwem Akpan (Say You're One of Them). Unfortunately, Uwem Akpan was unable to make it (he had to catch a flight back to Nigeria). As disappointed as I was that he could not make it, I was pleased to discover a new-to-me author whose work, of course, I now need to try. In his place was author Gina Nahai (Caspian Rain). Author Luis Alberto Urrea (Into the Beautiful North), another new-to-me author, was also on the panel, along with the moderator, Veronique de Turenne.

I thoroughly enjoyed the Borderlines panel. The authors each talked about their backgrounds, including their heritage and languages. Nahai was born in Iran and has not been back since she left in 1977. Because of her books, she is not in a position to return there under the current regime, unfortunately. Nahai spoke of a permanent amnesia of her time in Iran, saying that the only time she seemed to remember the country and her life there was when she is writing and it is through her books that her memories flow.

Thrity Umrigar is from India. She talked a little about her own family history. She also talked about her novel, The Space Between Us (which I highly recommend if you haven't read it), and how she had hoped someone else would write the story. The novel is about a mistress and her hired servant and their relationship, their class differences and the bond between them. Umrigar pointed out that, in India, because the labor pool is large and cheap, it is common for middle class families to have hired help. It seemed an obvious subject matter to want to write about, she thought. When she realized that no one else was doing so, she decided that she would.

Luis Alberto Urrea was born to an American mother and Mexican father in Mexico. During his childhood, he thought his mother's strange sounds and pronunciations were funny, however, now, as an adult, it makes him sad. His mother was surrounded by the Spanish language, and yet she could not speak the language, and therefore, had trouble communicating even with her own son.

Each of the authors had a chance to read a passage from their books as well as discuss misconceptions of their cultures. Gina Nahai pointed out that on a positive side, literature has opened many doors to understanding.

After the panel, we made our way to the signing area. I was eager to meet Thrity Umrigar and Luis Alberto Urrea. I would have liked the chance to meet Gina Nahai as well, but since her substitution was short notice, she was not present at the signing. Urrea's latest book, which technically isn't available until next month, was on hand for festival goers, and so I was able to buy a copy for the author to sign while there.

Anjin's and my second panel of the day was called Mystery: Guns and Gams. Being the crime fiction lover that I am, you know I had to attend at least one mystery panel. Sitting on the panel were authors Cara Black (Aimee Leduc series), Lisa Lutz (Spellman series) and Harley Jane Kozak (Wollie Shelley series). It was moderated by Mary McNamara. In this case, I have not read any of the books by the authors present, but I had heard of each of them and have wanted to read their books for some time now. My husband, at least, had read the first book in Cara Black's series, Murder in the Marais.

It was a fun panel. The discussion ranged from food, the creation of their female leads in each of the series, the benefits of having a female protagonist, the sense of place in their novels, and the writing process. I thought the panel make up was perfect--each of the authors are very different from one another as are their series. Lisa Lutz had no intention of writing a mystery series, when she began writing Spellman Files. The book was meant to be comic fiction. Her novels do not include big crimes like murder as so many mysteries today do. Instead, she focuses on every day life and the familial relationships of her characters. Harley Jane Kozak set out to write a literary fiction novel and what she ended up with was quite different. She was relieved when she discovered she was really writing a mystery. It felt like "salvation" she said. Cara Black, on the other hand, set out to write mysteries from the start. She was an avid mystery reader, admiring authors like P.D. James. The idea for her first novel sprang up from a true story her mother told her. She felt the story was important enough to tell and settled on a mystery as the best format to tell it. For Black, sense of place is very much a part of each of her novels. During the session, there were many jokes cracked and both my husband and I were smiling as we left the hall.

For the rest of the afternoon, Anjin and I wandered around the booths. We stopped by one booth to say hello to author Paul Levine (Solomon vs. Lord series) and he was kind enough to sign a book for me. Anjin and I were soon ready to call it a day. With our backpacks full of books, we headed for our car and the drive home.

There were many highlights to this year's Los Angeles Times Festival of Books, but biggest of them all was meeting fellow bloggers. Being able to sit and talk with them truly enhanced the festival experience. I had no reason to be nervous. Everyone was wonderful. And I mean that. I'm not just saying that because they might read this post. I hope we can all do get together again next year. And maybe next time, you can join us too!




If you want to see photos from the festival and to hear what other book bloggers have to say, be sure and stop by the following blogs:
Lisa from Books on the Brain
Tracy from Shelf Life
Amy From My Friend Amy (Vlog)
- (also check out Amy's Ten Things I Learned At the LA Times Book Festival)
Amy From My Friend Amy (Sunday Salon)
Hey, Lady! Watcha Readin' (Part 1: Vlog)
Hey, Lady! Watcha Readin' (Trish Geeking Out Over the Festival of Books)
Natasha from Maw Books Blog (Part 1: Vlog)
Natasha from Maw Books Blog (Part 2: In Which I Meet Awewsome Book Bloggers)
Ti from Book Chatter and Other Stuff
Florinda from The 3 R's: Reading, 'Riting, and Randomness
Jill from Fizzy Thoughts (To FoB or Not to FoB)
Jill from Fizzy Thoughts (Social Networking Panel)
Jill from Fizzy Thoughts (Window on the World Panel)
Jill from Fizzy Thoughts (Intimate Strangers Panel)
Jill from Fizzy Thoughts (Borderlines Panel)


Note: I will be taking a brief break from blogging the rest of this week and next. Don't despair! I will be back. May promises to be a busy and exciting month here at Musings of a Bookish Kitty, and I can't wait to tell you about what I have been reading. Happy Reading!

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Sunday Salon: An April Reading Retrospective - A Revelation

My feet are a little sore, and the suntan lotion didn't quite work as well as I had hoped. I am not sure how much reading I will get done today, but it will be a book-filled day nonetheless. It is the second day of the Los Angeles Times Festival of Books and no one can keep me away!

With spring underway and April nearly over, I decided this would be the perfect time to reflect back on my reading five years ago this month. Care to travel down Memory Lane with me?

As I sat down to review my reading journal from April 2004, I noticed I had only read three books the entire month that year. I got off to a slow start but finished the month off with two quick reads: Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code and To the Nines by Janet Evanovich. I enjoyed both books. They offered me adventure, one full of puzzles and intrigue and the other full of hijinks and laughs.

But what captured my attention most was my review of the first book I finished that month, Lord Foul's Bane by Stephen R. Donaldson. This particular book was a milestone in my reading, and so when I found the review, I eagerly read over my thoughts of the book all those years ago. And I was disappointed with myself. Not one word about why that book stands out still today.

I read the book for an online reading group discussion. Fantasy was a genre that I had grown to love over the years, and I was really curious about this particular book.

Lord Foul's Bane is the first of the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever:
Thomas Covenant is a troubled and isolated man who finds himself in an alternate world. He believes he is in a dream and takes on the title of the Unbeliever as a result. He is the chosen one who is expected to save or damn the Land. Thomas Covenant himself is not a likeable man. He is an anti-hero who is mean and dour through most of the book. [passage from my reading journal, April 2004]
The truth is I did not like Thomas Covenant; in fact, I vehemently despised him. Never before had I been tempted to throw a book across the room, but I nearly did with this one. Thomas Covenant committed an unspeakable crime I could not get past. Not entirely, anyway. I almost did not finish the book, and yet, for some reason, I found it in myself to persevere. It just took a while. I have never regretted my decision to go on. I actually ended up liking the book in the end even though I never warmed to the character of Thomas.

Lord Foul's Bane was a turning point for me. It was the book that made me realize that I did not have to actually like the main character in order to enjoy a book. Before then, I was a staunch believer that to enjoy a book, I had to be able to relate to the main character and at least like him or her. I am not sure what changed for me. Perhaps it was maturity or a recognition of the beauty found in other characteristics of a book, such as minor characters, the setting, the themes, the plot lines or the writing itself.

I did find other characters to admire and cheer for (Saltheart Foamfollower, the giant, and Bannor the Bloodguard in particular) in Lord Foul's Bane, which definitely helped me find a more comfortable thread to hold onto. My need for a character, however minor, to connect with still exists to some extent. Only, I have reached a point in my reading where I can look beyond the obvious for something to anchor me to a book. Having that anchor, or connection, is a necessity for me. It is what keeps me interested and wanting to read further. When there is no connection, I lose interest quickly and move on.

When I think of Lord Foul's Bane today, I have mixed feelings. I still despise Thomas Covenant. I am not sure he will ever be able to redeem himself in my eyes. At the same time, however, I admire Stephen R. Donaldson's craftsmanship. He has written an amazing fantasy novel. It is dark, exciting, and a true adventure. I love the set up of the story: not knowing if it is a dream or real. Someday I do plan to continue with the series. I just haven't yet built up the motivation.

Have you ever come across a protagonist who does something you just can't forgive?

Does your enjoyment of a novel hinge on whether you like or can relate to the main character(s)?

Was there a book that had you thinking you might give up on it one minute only to discover that by the end, you were glad you read it?


Week in Review:

A Page In the Life of Nicola of Back to Books
Review: Starfinder by John Marco
My Weekend Plans & A Quick Challenge Update

Stop in and check out Anjin's thoughts on The Burglar in the Closet by Lawrence Block!